Imposing a retroactive period of 30 years is a reactive addition to the Building Safety Bill and is not the solution. However, the proposal to extend liability periods is unrealistic, unworkable, and unachievable and has the danger of potentially persecuting innocent parties without the means to defend themselves or without any realistic positive outcome for the owner/occupant.Ĭanary Wharf buildings, Isle of Dogs, east London:
Building Safety Bill, English High Rise Materials, Tower Cladding Tests, Housing Estate ACM Panels News Building Safety Bill UKĬIAT raises serious concerns and responds to the Lords’ Committee Stages as the Building Safety Bill moves through Parliamentīuilding Safety Bill – UK Construction MaterialsĬIAT supports the premise of taking appropriate action against those who have deliberately and knowingly specified, provided, or fitted substandard materials.
0 kommentar(er)
